FOR INSTRUCTORS

A useful question.
A workable class.

Give each student a political problem worth explaining. Every simulation works individually. Choose the concept, check the guide and bring their decisions back into the discussion.

THE PRACTICAL DETAILS FIRST

What fits this class?

Times are planning estimates. Add discussion and writing time as needed. Where timing is unmeasured, pilot the activity or assign a clear stopping point.

Compare all activities. For a more readable narrow-screen comparison, choose up to three with the comparison tool.
ActivityConcepts & formatPacing & preparationWhat students producePlan it
The Power CircuitExecutives, legislatures & government formation
Solo simulation
Three resumable acts · pilot timing pending

No specialist knowledge required. Brief explanations introduce each rulebook.

Institutional comparison and research briefTeaching guide →Compare →
The Shared CountryFederalism, authority & territorial diversity
Solo simulation
Self-paced solo edition · timing not yet measured

No advance reading. Read each government’s priorities and construct plausible positions on your own.

Constitutional choices, government positions and an individual explanationTeaching guide →Compare →
Everyone Says DemocracyDemocratic support, concepts & measurement
Solo simulation
Self-paced inquiry · timing not yet measured

Self-contained introduction. Original research is available for extension.

Research brief, measurement choices and revisionsTeaching guide →Compare →
The Overloaded StateState capacity, bureaucracy & implementation
Solo simulation
Self-paced inquiry · timing not yet measured

Self-contained introduction; no advance reading required.

Capacity diagnosis and reform/evaluation briefTeaching guide →Compare →
Reply AcrossNationalism, federal arrangements & comparative inference
Solo simulation
45–60 min · optional +10 min

Best after a basic introduction to nationalism.

Addressed reply with predictions and revisionsTeaching guide →Compare →
ManytideBelonging, public systems & federalism
Solo simulation
45–60 min · optional +10 min

No prior theory knowledge needed. A useful opening before a lecture.

Field journal with evidence and revised explanationsTeaching guide →Compare →
Name the ProblemRepresentation, problem definition & political judgment
Solo simulation
About 50 min · allow time for reflection

Choose the comparative case for this course. Core or Full guidance is available.

Public poster plus separate reasoning/revision reportTeaching guide →Compare →
A Door That Says OpenParticipation, access & accountability
Solo simulation
About 55 min of active work

No specialist knowledge required. Read the case records as you go.

Evidence, hypothesis and revision reportTeaching guide →Compare →
Greenovia: The Belonging TestCitizenship, nationalism & recognition
Solo simulation
85–110 min · take-home estimate

Self-contained; suitable for a take-home synthesis. Allow time for explanation.

Charter, council decisions and comparative reportTeaching guide →Compare →
The SquareCollective action, coordination & selective incentives
Solo simulation
45–55 min · with optional discussion

No advance reading. You play one citizen; the other nineteen are programmed.

Forecasts, choices and reasoning recordTeaching guide →Compare →
Hold the HeadlineEvidence, state performance & causal claims
Solo simulation
45–55 min · planning estimate

No advance reading required. All case records are in the activity.

Evidence and revision reportTeaching guide →Compare →
Protection, Inc.: The Price of PowerState formation, extraction & institutional continuity
Solo simulation
45–55 min · planning estimate

No advance preparation. Work through the offers and continuing records.

Bargaining, institutional comparison and explanation reportTeaching guide →Compare →

The Power Circuit →

Focus / format
Executives, legislatures & government formation · Solo
Time
Three resumable acts · pilot timing pending
Preparation
No specialist knowledge required. Brief explanations introduce each rulebook.
Output
Institutional comparison and research brief
Teaching guide →Compare →

The Shared Country →

Focus / format
Federalism, authority & territorial diversity · Solo
Time
Self-paced solo edition · timing not yet measured
Preparation
No advance reading. Read each government’s priorities and construct plausible positions on your own.
Output
Constitutional choices, government positions and an individual explanation
Teaching guide →Compare →

Everyone Says Democracy →

Focus / format
Democratic support, concepts & measurement · Solo
Time
Self-paced inquiry · timing not yet measured
Preparation
Self-contained introduction. Original research is available for extension.
Output
Research brief, measurement choices and revisions
Teaching guide →Compare →

The Overloaded State →

Focus / format
State capacity, bureaucracy & implementation · Solo
Time
Self-paced inquiry · timing not yet measured
Preparation
Self-contained introduction; no advance reading required.
Output
Capacity diagnosis and reform/evaluation brief
Teaching guide →Compare →

Reply Across →

Focus / format
Nationalism, federal arrangements & comparative inference · Solo
Time
45–60 min · optional +10 min
Preparation
Best after a basic introduction to nationalism.
Output
Addressed reply with predictions and revisions
Teaching guide →Compare →

Manytide →

Focus / format
Belonging, public systems & federalism · Solo
Time
45–60 min · optional +10 min
Preparation
No prior theory knowledge needed. A useful opening before a lecture.
Output
Field journal with evidence and revised explanations
Teaching guide →Compare →

Name the Problem →

Focus / format
Representation, problem definition & political judgment · Solo
Time
About 50 min · allow time for reflection
Preparation
Choose the comparative case for this course. Core or Full guidance is available.
Output
Public poster plus separate reasoning/revision report
Teaching guide →Compare →

The Square →

Focus / format
Collective action, coordination & selective incentives · Solo
Time
45–55 min · with optional discussion
Preparation
No advance reading. You play one citizen; the other nineteen are programmed.
Output
Forecasts, choices and reasoning record
Teaching guide →Compare →

Hold the Headline →

Focus / format
Evidence, state performance & causal claims · Solo
Time
45–55 min · planning estimate
Preparation
No advance reading required. All case records are in the activity.
Output
Evidence and revision report
Teaching guide →Compare →

ASSESSMENT & SUBMISSION

Grade the explanation.
The interface has no opinion.

Set an endpoint, ask for the activity’s readable report, and use your existing LMS. Students can use Print / Save as PDF where a separate download is not offered. A progress backup is for restoring work, not grading it.

A suggested 10-point rubric

For each criterion: 0 = absent, 1 = partial, 2 = clear and supported. Adapt the weighting to your course; this is guidance, not automatic scoring.

Concepts / 2
Use the relevant political concept accurately.
Evidence / 2
Support a claim with a specific record or comparison.
Mechanism / 2
Explain how the rule or arrangement produces a consequence.
Revision / 2
Address a rival account or explain a change of mind.
Limits / 2
State what the model or evidence cannot establish.

Say this before they begin.

  1. Choose For class and follow the instructor’s endpoint.
  2. Save a progress backup before moving devices or changing website address.
  3. Open the readable report and check the required responses.
  4. Upload it to the course assignment. Check the LMS submission confirmation.

Switching from exploration keeps the current work, but skipped class responses may still need completing. A local report cannot establish authorship or make an activity tamper-proof.

THE WORK YOU TAKE AWAY

A record of the reasoning.

A readable report brings together choices, evidence and explanations. Save it, check it, then upload it to your course assignment. A download is not a submission.

Instructors assess the argument. Reports are editable local records, not authenticated receipts or automatically verified grades.

See an illustrative report ↗ (opens in a new tab)
SAMPLE / FICTIONAL ANSWERS

The rule. The evidence. The revision.

  1. My decisionWhich arrangement did I choose?
  2. My evidenceWhat observation supports the explanation?
  3. What changedWhich comparison made me revise it?
  4. What remains openWhat would I need to know next?

Actual report layouts vary by activity.

Individual choices.
A better class discussion.

Share the link, specify an endpoint and tell students what to submit. Each simulation supplies its own brief, evidence and prompts.

Use it before class, during an individual work period or as a take-home assignment. Then compare decisions: where did students diverge, and which rule or piece of evidence explains why?

Grade the explanation.

Completion is participation. Assess how students connect concepts, rules and evidence, address rival accounts and explain revisions. A choice you disagree with can still be well argued.

IF YOU WANT TO BUILD A SEQUENCE

Connect the questions.

Suggested routes, not experimentally validated sequences. One activity can also stand alone.

Nation & belonging

Who gets to belong, and on whose terms?

Begin with Manytide, introduce nationalism before Reply Across, then use Greenovia for synthesis.

Collective action

Why does a shared interest not guarantee action?

Compare incentives and coordination, then discuss what the programmed model leaves out.

No student accounts or class dashboard are needed. Students download a report and submit it through your existing LMS. A progress backup restores a session; it is not the readable assignment.

Make it an assignment.

Edit this text, then copy it into your LMS. These edits stay in this tab.

Syllabus description & discussion prompts

Syllabus description

Bargain for a coalition, face a confidence vote and confront the same crisis under three political systems. The votes stay the same. The rules change what they can do. Students produce institutional comparison and research brief.

Questions for a discussion board or class debrief

  1. When did the same vote have a different consequence?
  2. Which tradeoff would you accept, and under what conditions?
Open printable teaching companion →